Free Speech

As a member of the "civilized" society we live in, I cannot feel any worries about genuine atheists because it is their right to believe or not to believe. Yet, ANTITHEISTS use the euphemism of ATHEISM.

ANTI means: antagonistic, defiant, opposing, enemy of, hostile, belligerant, destructive, violent, furious, etc. etc. etc.

And narrowing the definition of ANTITHEISTS we reach the buttomline: THE ANTICHRIST ACTIVISTS and their DECEPTIVE AGENDA.

Let's dare to think by ourselves. It's not against the Law of the Land yet and I refuse to be "politically correct".

We've all heard about the possibility of the federal government getting involved in controlling the airwaves and dictating exactly what kind of speech can be broadcast and to exactly what degree, by way of the Fairness Doctrine. To the greatest degree, most of the press has been given to this movement's efforts to regulate the airwaves on television and the radio to ensure that 'equal time' is given to 'both sides' of every issue.

But, as is pointed out by Jeff Poor of The Business & Media Institute, those efforts to dictate content could even go so far as controlling the messages embodied within websites of various causes, as well!

There’s a huge concern among conservative talk radio hosts that reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine would all-but destroy the industry due to equal time constraints. But speech limits might not stop at radio. They could even be extended to include the Internet and “government dictating content policy.”

FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell raised that as a possibility after talking with bloggers at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C. McDowell spoke about a recent FCC vote to bar Comcast from engaging in certain Internet practices – expanding the federal agency’s oversight of Internet networks.