Dear Mr. ________: I sent you an e-mail via your daughter (assistant) some time ago. I have attached at the end of this little note the original text.

I was rather shocked to see an article in the newspaper confirming my information. I thought that these family units would only be arriving at some future date, far in the future. The article went something to this effect. A well known artist from Montreal living in California with his homosexual partner, announced the birth of his daughter with a lesbian (friend?, family member?). What was so revealing to me was his homosexual partner was named as the second father!

Original text to Mr. ______'s daughter.(assistant)...       

Canada is in Deep trouble! Could this happen to you?

As you will probably be aware that here in Canada we now have a law allowing gay marriage. This law, to a large extent, was pushed by an extremely large gay community here in Quebec, Canada, where I live. Montreal especially is becoming a very large center for sexual deviants. It is not for nothing that the first ever world gay games were held in Montreal. This was a financial disaster for the province of Quebec and the city of Montreal.

          This has not stopped the flow of sexual deviants coming into Quebec and specifically Montreal.

          The next step in their program is to change the

law that limits marriage between two people.

 Yes, logically, I suppose they have some claim, once they have removed the religious aspect from the marriage law; it is difficult to argue against them.

          The plan is quite simple; they want to form family units of four people,… Two lesbians and two homosexuals. This family unit will then revolve around sex for pleasure and sex for reproduction! I will leave it to your imagination to discover how this family concept would be carried out.

          Without marriage based on the religious premise of uniting one man and one woman, can anyone see any real legal reason why this should not come about?

The following is my summary of the Green Party Convention (Canada) held in late August 2010.

This notice appeared during the convention on Canadian news …

The Green Party of Canada discussed to some length the motion of polygamy (marriage with more than 2 people). The discussion was then approved by a vote. It was decided that it was a question of human rights for an individual who wanted to have a second or third life partner. The workshop passed the motion 14-8 so that it could then go to the floor of the national convention where it was voted down.

Still, I was extremely surprised to see how far the sexual deviants of Canada had progressed with having their plan accepted.