The backlash against the Obama administration's policy requiring church-affiliated organizations to...
Supreme Court hears case on Christian student club
The Supreme Court heard a case this week involving the First Amendment rights of the Christian Legal Society and whether or not it's lawful for public schools and colleges to deny Christian groups the same recognition or benefits that are offered to other campus organizations which are secular.
The case hinges on the fact that the society maintains a membership clause that requires members to sign a statement attesting to their Christian Faith. As a result, they've been denied recognition by the University of California's Hastings College of Law in (you guessed it) San Francisco.
As one can imagine, the Court is "divided" along the usual liberal/conservative lines, with newly added Justice Sotomayor seeming to come down on the "liberal" side of things and taking the position of the school's right to dictate policy. On the other hand, Justice Scalia pointing out that the school's policies would "require this Christian society to allow atheists not just to join, but to conduct Bible classes...", adding that "That's crazy".
It should also come as no surprise that the National School Boards Association, the National Association of Secondary School Principles, etc., filed friend-of-the-court briefs on behalf of Hastings Law School. It seems that the fact that not allowing a religious group to discriminate on the basis of its faith makes absolutely no sense is lost on them. Or perhaps it's not...which would say even more about them and their motives.
If such logic is adopted by the High Court here, how soon before some enterprising (and litigious) liberals look to apply it in terms of Christian schools and church hiring practices?
("Not long" is the correct answer...)
Follow @DrewMcKissick
- Capitol Notebook's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|



Responces
Comments
Thomas Paine - Father of the American Revolution, author of the revolution inciting Common Sense http://books.google.com/books?id=e0oqAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=com...
All the below and much more from The Age of Reason http://books.google.com/books?id=fFMMMmQk1CsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=the+age+of+reason&cd=2#v=onepage&q&f=false
But when the divine gift of reason begins to expand itself in the mind and calls man to reflection, he then reads and contemplates God and His works, and not in the books pretending to be revelation. The creation is the Bible of the true believer in God. Everything in this vast volume inspires him with sublime ideas of the Creator. The little and paltry, and often obscene, tales of the Bible sink into wretchedness when put in comparison with this mighty work.
The Deist needs none of those tricks and shows called miracles to confirm his faith, for what can be a greater miracle than the creation itself, and his own existence?
There is a happiness in Deism, when rightly understood, that is not to be found in any other system of religion. All other systems have something in them that either shock our reason, or are repugnant to it, and man, if he thinks at all, must stifle his reason in order to force himself to believe them.
But in Deism our reason and our belief become happily united. The wonderful structure of the universe, and everything we behold in the system of the creation, prove to us, far better than books can do, the existence of a God, and at the same time proclaim His attributes.
It is by the exercise of our reason that we are enabled to contemplate God in His works, and imitate Him in His ways. When we see His care and goodness extended over all His creatures, it teaches us our duty toward each other, while it calls forth our gratitude to Him. It is by forgetting God in His works, and running after the books of pretended revelation, that man has wandered from the straight path of duty and happiness, and become by turns the victim of doubt and the dupe of delusion.
Except in the first article in the Christian creed, that of believing in God, there is not an article in it but fills the mind with doubt as to the truth of it, the instant man begins to think. Now every article in a creed that is necessary to the happiness and salvation of man, ought to be as evident to the reason and comprehension of man as the first article is, for God has not given us reason for the purpose of confounding us, but that we should use it for our own happiness and His glory.
Are liberals the only one with rights today?
Keith @ http://whatisthebible.com